⚠️ Please use a computer for the best experience

Business Management

Organizational behavior, management functions, IPO model, leadership, and decision-making (BADM 310)

Week 1Introduction to Organizational Behavior

W1A: Management Basics

Is management just common sense?

Is Management Common Sense?

Management is not simply common sense. Many intuitive management beliefs are empirically wrong or incomplete. Effective management requires systematic study of evidence from psychology, sociology, anthropology, and economics — not just gut feeling.

Key insight

Common-sense beliefs about people and organizations are often contradicted by research. OB provides a scientific, evidence-based framework for understanding workplace behavior.

Traditional Functions of Management (POLC)

The four classic functions managers perform, often taught as the foundation of management:

PPlanning

Setting goals and determining how to achieve them. Defining objectives, strategies, and action plans.

OOrganizing

Arranging resources and tasks to accomplish goals. Designing structure, assigning roles, allocating resources.

LLeading

Directing and influencing people to work toward goals. Motivating, communicating, and resolving conflict.

CControlling

Monitoring performance and taking corrective action. Measuring outcomes against plans and adjusting as needed.

IPO Model (Input → Process → Outcome)

A core framework in OB: organizational outcomes depend on the processes that transform inputs. The key managerial implication is to fix the process, not blame the person.

Input

  • Individual characteristics
  • Group mechanisms
  • Organizational context

Process

  • Job satisfaction
  • Motivation
  • Stress
  • Learning & decisions
  • Trust / ethics

Outcome

  • Job performance
  • Organizational commitment
  • Organizational results

Fix the process, not the person: When outcomes are poor, examine and redesign the process rather than simply replacing individuals.

W1B: What is Organizational Behavior?

Definition, disciplines, and the integrative model

Definition of OB

Organizational Behavior (OB) is an interdisciplinary field dedicated to understanding and managing people at work.

OB draws on multiple social sciences to explain why people think, feel, and act the way they do in organizational settings, and to help managers make better decisions about people.

Contributing Disciplines

Psychology

Individual behavior, personality, motivation, perception, learning, attitudes

Sociology

Group dynamics, organizational structure, social norms, team behavior

Anthropology

Culture, values, cross-cultural behavior, organizational culture

Economics

Incentives, decision-making under constraints, labor markets, agency theory

Integrative Model of OB

The integrative model shows how individual, group, and organizational factors flow through individual mechanisms to produce outcomes.

LevelInputs / MechanismsRole in the Model
Individual CharacteristicsPersonality & cultural values, abilityInput — shape how individuals process situations
Group MechanismsTeams & diversity, communication, power & influence, leadershipInput — the social context around individuals
Individual MechanismsJob satisfaction, stress, motivation, trust/justice/ethics, learning & decision-makingProcess — the psychological states that drive behavior
Individual OutcomesJob performance, organizational commitmentOutcome — directly observable results
Organizational OutcomeUnit/firm performance, financial resultsOutcome — aggregate organizational results

Good Management

Effective managers use OB principles to:

  • Attract talented people to the organization
  • Develop skills and capabilities in their teams
  • Motivate people to perform at high levels
  • Retain key talent over the long term
  • Organize and coordinate individuals and groups effectively
  • Provide wise, ethical, and effective leadership

Management sits atop the core business functions (Operations, Finance, Marketing, R&D), integrating and directing them all.

W1C: Why Does OB Matter?

Research evidence for the business impact of good people management

Startup IPO Survival Study

A landmark study tracked 170 companies that went public (IPO). After 5 years:

170

IPO startups tracked

48%

still in business after 5 years

OB

practices predicted survival

Survivors were more likely to:

  • Offer stock options or profit-sharing to all employees (not just executives)
  • Use full-time employees rather than contractors
  • Invest in training and development programs

Takeaway: OB best practices — equity, stability, and development — significantly predict organizational survival.

Burger King Study — Social Recognition

An experiment tested whether social recognition (non-financial acknowledgment of good work) improves performance.

Intervention

  • Managers trained to recognize employees verbally for good work
  • Simple, low-cost behavioral change

Results

  • 44 sec drive-through time (trained) vs. 62 sec (control)
  • 16% better employee retention rate

Key finding: A simple OB intervention (social recognition) produced measurable improvements in both performance and retention — at essentially zero cost.

W1D: The Resource Perspective

Individuals and teams as valuable organizational resources

The resource perspective frames people as a key organizational resource — one that can be managed to simultaneously increase revenue and decrease costs.

Increase Revenue

  • +Team synergyCoordinated teams produce more than the sum of individuals
  • +Loyalty & motivationCommitted employees go above and beyond for customers
  • +Charismatic leadershipInspires teams to achieve more than expected
  • +Effective decision-makingBetter decisions lead to better products and strategies
  • +Customer satisfactionSatisfied employees create satisfied customers who return
  • +Diversity fosters innovationDiverse teams generate more creative solutions

Decrease Costs

  • Lower turnover costsRetaining employees avoids recruitment, hiring, and training expenses
  • Reduced stress costsManaging workplace stress reduces absenteeism and health costs
  • Better retentionHigh commitment = less churn = fewer replacement costs
  • Fewer formal processesSatisfied, trusted employees need less formal monitoring and control
  • Effective decisionsFewer costly errors and misallocations
  • Less financial incentive relianceNon-monetary motivation reduces compensation overhead

Wrap-Up: The IPO Model Revisited

The resource perspective reinforces the IPO model: investing in people (inputs) and designing effective processes (OB interventions) generates measurable outcomes — both financial performance and individual well-being.

W1E: Framing and Addressing Management Problems

Diagnosing why people don't do what they need to do

What is a Management Problem?

A management problem exists when individuals, groups, or organizations fail to meet their goals because people are not doing what they need to do. The root question is always: Why not?

Unmet Goal
People not doing what they need to do
▼ Why not?

Not ABLE

Lack skills, resources, clear expectations, or capacity

Don't CHOOSE to

Not motivated, don't see value, or choose not to

Management Solution: Create conditions to be ABLE + CHOOSE

Addressing Management Problems

The manager's job is to create conditions under which people both:

ABLE to behave

  • Clear expectations and goals
  • Proper skills and training
  • Adequate resources and tools
  • Supportive work environment

CHOOSE to behave

  • Motivation and incentives
  • Meaningful and satisfying work
  • Trust, fairness, and respect
  • Culture that values the behavior

Case Examples

Bausch + LombCulture problem

Intense pressure to meet sales targets led employees to engage in fraudulent sales practices. The CHOOSE dimension was corrupted — employees chose unethical behavior because the culture rewarded results at any cost.

MassMutualGrowth problem

Rapid growth required employees to work smarter and harder, but people weren't adapting fast enough. Both ABLE (needed new skills) and CHOOSE (motivation to embrace change) were involved.

University of Colorado HospitalEfficiency problem

Slow processes and staff not following updated protocols led to inefficiency. Root cause: were staff not ABLE (didn't know the protocols) or not CHOOSING to (resistant to change)?

Week 2Job Performance, Organizational Commitment, Managing & Retaining

W2A: Job Performance

What counts as performance and how to measure it

What is Job Performance?

Job performance = the set of employee behaviors that contribute positively or negatively to organizational goal accomplishment.

Performance is about behaviors, not just outcomes. The same outcome can result from different behaviors, and behaviors are more directly under management control than outcomes.

Task Performance

Task performance refers to behaviors that directly involve the transformation of organizational resources into the goods or services the organization produces.

Routine Task Performance

Programmed

Responding to task demands in a habitual or programmed way — well-defined procedures and predictable situations.

e.g. Processing a standard insurance claim using established procedures

Adaptive Task Performance

Flexible

Responding to task demands that are novel, unusual, or unpredictable — adjusting when circumstances change.

e.g. Handling an unexpected system outage by improvising a workaround

Creative Task Performance

Generative

Generating novel and useful ideas or solutions to problems — going beyond existing procedures.

e.g. Designing a new customer onboarding process from scratch

O*NET — Occupational Information Network

O*NET is the US Department of Labor database that describes the tasks, skills, and requirements for virtually every occupation. It provides empirical, detailed task profiles managers can use to define and assess job performance.

How it helps managers:

  • Define clear task expectations before hiring
  • Identify which performance behaviors matter most for a given role
  • Create objective performance appraisal criteria
  • Compare jobs across organizations for compensation benchmarking

W2B: Citizenship & Counterproductive Behavior

The full spectrum of work behavior — going above and beyond vs. actively harming

Citizenship Behavior (OCB)

Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCBs) are voluntary behaviors not directly required by the job description that nonetheless benefit the organization. They represent the discretionary effort employees choose to give.

Organizational OCBs

Directed at the organization as a whole

  • Voice:Speaking up with ideas for improving procedures or policies
  • Civic Virtue:Attending optional meetings, keeping up with org news, participating in governance
  • Boosterism:Representing the company positively to outsiders

Interpersonal OCBs

Directed at individual coworkers

  • Helping:Assisting coworkers with work tasks or personal problems
  • Courtesy:Keeping others informed about changes, giving advance notice
  • Sportsmanship:Tolerating inevitable inconveniences without complaining

Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB)

CWBs are employee behaviors that intentionally hinder the organization or its members from achieving goals. They fall into a 2×2 matrix based on target (organizational vs. interpersonal) and severity (serious vs. minor).

Organizational TargetInterpersonal Target
Serious

Property Deviance

Sabotage, theft, vandalism, misusing organizational resources deliberately

Personal Aggression

Harassment, physical abuse, threats, verbal abuse directed at coworkers

Minor

Production Deviance

Cyber-loafing, wasting supplies, leaving early, working slowly on purpose

Political Deviance

Gossip, favoritism, taking credit for others' work, spreading rumors

W2C: Performance Management

Setting expectations, assessing performance, and providing feedback

The Performance Management Cycle

1Set Expectations
  • Define clear goals and standards
  • Communicate what 'good' looks like
  • Align individual goals with org goals
  • Use job descriptions and OKRs
2Assess Performance
  • Formal appraisals (annual/quarterly)
  • BARS — Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales
  • 360-degree multi-source feedback
  • Continuous observation and data
3Provide Feedback
  • Regular 1-on-1 coaching conversations
  • Developmental feedback (not just evaluation)
  • Recognize and reward good performance
  • Address gaps with support plans

BARS — Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales

BARS is an appraisal method that anchors each rating level with specific behavioral examples, reducing rater bias and improving consistency.

Example: "Customer Communication" dimension

5 — Excellent

Proactively updates customers before they ask, anticipates concerns, follows up after resolution

3 — Acceptable

Responds to customer inquiries within 24 hours, answers questions accurately

1 — Poor

Often fails to respond, provides incorrect information, leaves customer issues unresolved

Traditional vs. Modern Performance Management

DimensionTraditionalModern (Recommended)
FrequencyAnnual reviewContinuous / ongoing
DirectionTop-down (manager evaluates)Two-way dialogue
FocusPast performance evaluationFuture development
PurposeCompensation decisionGrowth & improvement
ToneEvaluative, summativeCoaching, developmental
Employee rolePassive recipientActive participant

McKinsey Recommendations for Modern PM

  • Focus on future development rather than evaluating the past
  • Have meaningful conversations throughout the year, not just at review time
  • Decouple compensation decisions from developmental conversations — keep them separate
  • Make feedback a habit, not a once-a-year event

W2D: Organizational Commitment

Why employees stay — and why it matters for performance

What is Organizational Commitment?

Organizational Commitment = the desire to remain a member of an organization.

AffectiveWant to stay

Emotional attachment and identification with the organization. Employees stay because they genuinely want to.

Love the mission, proud of the culture, feel part of the team

ContinuanceHave to stay

Awareness of the costs associated with leaving. Employees stay because switching is too costly.

High salary hard to replicate, pension vesting, no other options, relocation cost

NormativeOught to stay

Sense of obligation or moral duty to remain. Employees stay because it feels wrong to leave.

Loyalty, reciprocity for training invested, sense of debt to the org

EVLN Model — Responses to Negative Events

When employees experience dissatisfaction or negative events, they respond in four ways along two axes: active vs. passive and constructive vs. destructive.

ConstructiveDestructive
Active

Voice

Actively trying to improve conditions — speaking up, suggesting changes, giving feedback to management

Exit

Actively leaving — quitting, transferring, searching for a new job

Passive

Loyalty

Passively waiting and hoping things improve — staying put, remaining faithful

Neglect

Passively allowing conditions to worsen — reduced effort, chronic lateness, higher error rates

Consequences of Low Organizational Commitment

Psychological Withdrawal

"Warm-chair attrition" — physically present, mentally absent

  • Daydreaming
  • Excessive socializing
  • Looking busy without working
  • Moonlighting (working on personal projects)
  • Cyber-loafing (personal internet use at work)

Physical Withdrawal

Physically removing oneself from work

  • Tardiness
  • Extended breaks
  • Missing meetings
  • Absenteeism
  • Quitting (turnover)

Research Evidence

Canadian Food Service Study

  • Affective commitment ↑ → higher job performance
  • Continuance commitment ↑ → lower job performance
  • Employees who stay because they want to work harder; those who stay because they have to do just enough

Meyer et al. 2002 Meta-Analysis

  • Affective commitment: positively correlated with performance
  • Normative commitment: positively correlated with performance (though weaker)
  • Continuance commitment: negatively correlated with performance

Managerial implication: Build affective commitment, not just continuance commitment. Employees who stay because they want to — not because they feel trapped — perform significantly better.

How to Increase Affective Commitment

Mind Your Culture

  • Foster diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
  • Build a genuine culture of commitment
  • Celebrate employee milestones and contributions

Examples: Employee Appreciation Day, Ben & Jerry's social values, Mary Kay recognition culture

Manage Well

  • Build trusting manager–employee relationships
  • Set clear goals with contingent rewards
  • Provide regular, honest feedback
  • Support employees' growth and well-being

W2E: Managing, Mentoring & Retaining Employees

Problem employees, coaching, mentoring, and keeping your best people

Managing Problem Employees

When an employee is underperforming, the instinct is often to ignore it or go straight to discipline. A more structured approach:

1Don't Ignore It

Ignoring performance problems signals that underperformance is acceptable and demoralizes high performers.

2Find the Cause

Is it ABLE (lack of skills, resources, clarity) or CHOOSE (motivation, attitude)? The fix differs for each.

3Ask Others

Get input from peers and other supervisors — is this pattern consistent, or situational?

4Talk to the Employee

Have a direct, honest, and respectful conversation. Identify the gap and agree on a path forward.

Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)

A formal document outlining: expected performance standards, specific gaps, timeline for improvement, available support, and consequences if goals are not met.

Reassignment

Sometimes the issue is fit, not effort. Jim Collins: "Get the right people in the right seats on the bus." Reassignment puts mismatched employees where they can succeed.

Coaching Employees

Expert Approach

Coach provides answers, advice, and direction. Useful when the employee genuinely lacks knowledge and needs direct instruction.

Consultative Approach

Coach draws out the employee's own thinking through questions. Builds ownership, insight, and lasting behavior change. Usually more effective.

Who is Coachable? (7 traits)

Tolerance for discomfortOpenness to feedbackEmotional awarenessTakes responsibilityCapacity for forgivenessSelf-disciplineAsks for support

Coaching Your Boss

  • Ask permission first — don't assume your boss wants coaching
  • Appeal to superordinate goals — frame feedback in terms of shared team/org goals
  • Specify behaviors — focus on observable actions, not personality
  • Stay future-focused — avoid relitigating the past

Mentoring Employees

Mentoring is a longer-term developmental relationship where a more experienced colleague (mentor) guides and supports the professional growth of a less experienced person (mentee).

Mentor provides:

  • Career guidance and navigation
  • Organizational knowledge and context
  • Networking introductions
  • Emotional support and encouragement

Mentee gains:

  • Faster career development
  • Insights from experience
  • Increased organizational commitment
  • Visibility and sponsorship

Training & Development

Organizations invest heavily in employee development — and the most effective learning doesn't happen in classrooms.

PwC 70-20-10 Development Model

70%

By Doing

On-the-job experience, stretch assignments, new challenges

20%

From Others

Coaching, mentoring, peer feedback, observation

10%

Formal Training

Courses, workshops, e-learning, certifications

$55.8B

US training expenditures (2012)

$101.6B

US training expenditures (2022)

Retaining Talent

3.5M

people quit per month in the US

18%

of the workforce turns over annually

~20%

of annual salary to replace one employee

Why People Quit

  • Poor relationship with their boss
  • Lack of growth opportunities
  • Better offer from another employer
  • Predictors: low job satisfaction + low organizational commitment

Strategies to Reduce Turnover

  • Design satisfying and meaningful jobs
  • Develop high performers (training & growth)
  • Provide realistic job previews (avoid unmet expectations)
  • Ensure pay equity relative to market
  • Hire for person–organization fit
Week 3Motivation — Expectancy, Self-Determination, Goal Setting & Equity

W3A: Motivation & Expectancy Theory

Definition, measurement, EIV model, and self-efficacy

What Is Motivation?

Gallup 2021

80%

of employees globally are not engaged in their work

We can directly observe behavior (e.g. perfect attendance) but we can only infer what causes it — is it motivation, conscientiousness, or something else? To test our inference we need an agreed definition and measurement approach.

Performance = Ability × Motivation × Opportunity

Definition

An unseen force that initiates work-related effort and determines its direction, level, and persistence.

How We Measure It

  • Direction — what is done
  • Level — how hard (intensity)
  • Persistence — how long

Sources of Motivation

Expected rewardAvoidance of punishmentInternal needsGoals

Expectancy Theory (EIV / VIE)

Expectancy theory asks three sequential questions. Motivation is high only when all three answers are positive.

ComponentQuestionKey Idea
Expectancy (E)If I try hard, will I perform well?Belief that effort leads to performance. Driven by self-efficacy — the belief that you have the capabilities needed to execute the required behaviors.
Instrumentality (I)If I perform well, will I receive outcomes?Belief that performance leads to outcomes. Requires trust, fair evaluations, available & timely rewards, and credible organizational control.
Valence (V)Will those outcomes satisfy me?Belief that outcomes will be satisfying. Includes intrinsic rewards (enjoyment, challenge) and extrinsic rewards (pay, praise, awards).

Self-Efficacy (Bandura, 1977)

The belief that a person has the capabilities needed to execute the behaviors required for task success. Affects the Expectancy component.

Four Sources of Self-Efficacy

Past Performance

Prior mastery experiences are the strongest source — success raises efficacy, failure lowers it

Vicarious Experience

Seeing someone similar succeed raises your own efficacy (social modeling)

Social Persuasion

Encouragement or feedback from others that you have the ability to succeed

Physiological States

Mood, stress levels, and physical arousal affect your perceived capability

Intrinsic Motivators

Rewards intrinsic to the work itself

  • Enjoyment of the task
  • Entertainment / challenge
  • Relief of boredom
  • Sense of purpose or meaning

Extrinsic Motivators

Rewards extrinsic to the work itself

  • Economic: pay, bonuses, incentives
  • Social: praise, recognition, awards
  • Career: promotions, titles

W3B: Self-Determination Theory

Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and why internalized motivation outperforms external control

Three Basic Psychological Needs

Internalized motivation comes from work that satisfies three fundamental human needs (Deci & Ryan, 2008). When these needs are met, employees develop autonomous motivation — they want to do the work rather than feeling they have to.

🧭 Autonomy

The need to be free — to direct our own actions and feel we are choosing what we do rather than being controlled.

Example: Being able to decide how to approach a project, flexible work hours, choosing which assignments to take on.

💪 Competence

The need to develop mastery over everyday challenges and feel capable at what we need to do.

Example: Stretch assignments, skill development opportunities, clear feedback that helps you improve.

🤝 Relatedness

The need to have others value us for who we are and to be connected to something greater than ourselves.

Example: Belonging to a team, meaningful relationships with coworkers, work that contributes to a larger mission.

Two Types of Management

Controlling Management

  • Uses pressure, surveillance, deadlines as control
  • Relies on external rewards and punishments
  • Produces introjected motivation — compliance, not commitment
  • Can undermine intrinsic motivation over time

Autonomy-Supportive Management

  • Takes the individual's perspective
  • Supports a sense of choice and ownership
  • Responsive to thoughts, questions, and initiatives
  • Fosters internalized motivation

Evidence: Autonomy Support Works

Providing autonomy support consistently boosts internalized motivation across contexts (Deci & Ryan, 2008, Canadian Psychology):

In Education

  • Greater persistence on learning tasks
  • Higher well-being and lower anxiety
  • Better academic performance

At Work

  • Greater job satisfaction
  • Higher trust in management
  • Better engagement and performance

Source: Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 1.

W3C: Goal Setting & Equity Theory

SMART goals, specific/difficult goals, equity distress, and responses to inequity

Goal Setting Theory

Goals are the primary drivers of the intensity and persistence of effort. Goal-setting theory has strong practical applications — performance reviews, job interviews, and goal-setting software all build on this research.

Specific vs. Vague Goals

✓ Specific

"Score a 90% on this exam"

✗ Vague

"Do your best on this exam"

Difficulty Sweet Spot

People work harder when goals are difficult but not impossible. Too easy = low effort; too hard = give up.

How Specific, Difficult Goals Help

  • Direct attention to goal-related activity
  • Increase intensity of effort
  • Increase persistence
  • Prompt useful task strategies

Goal-Setting Works Best When…

Goals are specific and difficult

Useful feedback is provided

Individuals participate in setting goals

The task is not overly complex

Goal commitment is high

SMART Goals Framework

S

Specific

Clear, well-defined, unambiguous

M

Measurable

Quantifiable progress and endpoint

A

Achievable

Challenging but realistic

R

Relevant

Aligned with broader objectives

T

Time-bound

Clear deadline or timeframe

Equity Theory

Equity is a basic need. We seek to have the ratio of our outcomes to inputs match those of a comparison other. Motivation doesn't just depend on your own beliefs — it also depends on what happens to other people.

The Equity Ratio

Self

Outcomesself

Inputsself

vs

Comparison Other

Outcomesother

Inputsother

When your ratio is lower than the comparison other's, you feel underpaid/undervalued → equity distress.

Equity Distress

  • The greater the inequity, the greater the distress
  • Major forms: anger (underpayment) and guilt (overpayment)
  • Balance may be restored by changing actual inputs or outcomes
  • Or by psychologically distorting perceptions of inputs and outcomes

Even monkeys reject unequal pay — capuchin monkeys given cucumber instead of grapes (when a peer gets grapes) will refuse and throw the food back.

Responses to Underpayment Inequity

  • Reduce work effort or quality (reduce inputs)
  • Request a raise or promotion (increase outcomes)
  • Compare to a lower-paid reference group
  • Leave the organization (exit)
  • Engage in counterproductive behavior (e.g., theft)

Responses to Overpayment Inequity

  • Work harder or put in more effort (increase inputs)
  • Convince yourself you deserve it (rationalize)
  • Compare to a higher-paid reference group
  • Feel short-lived guilt that fades over time
Week 4Learning and Decision Making

W4A: Decision Making

Why we make bad decisions — and how to make better ones

Two Modes of Thinking

Our brains use two distinct thinking systems. Decision-making is constrained by bounded rationality — limited information, time, and cognitive processing ability.

System 1: Intuitive

Unconscious, fast, automatic. Relies on mental shortcuts (heuristics). "Go with your gut." Default mode — avoids effortful System 2 thinking.

Useful for routine decisions; dangerous for complex or novel ones.

System 2: Analytical

Conscious, slow, deliberate. Requires effort and attention. Used for complex problems, new situations, and decisions with high stakes.

More accurate but cognitively expensive — people avoid it when possible.

Decision-Making Biases

BiasDefinitionExample
Availability BiasPersonal familiarity with something inflates our estimate of its probabilityOverestimating how many students wear Gies gear because you notice it more
Representativeness BiasAn extreme event is taken as representative of a whole category, ignoring base ratesExpecting a stock to keep rising because it rose last week
Anchoring BiasOver-reliance on the first number seen as a reference point; insufficient adjustmentA high asking price anchors salary negotiations upward even when unreasonable
Confirmation BiasSeeking information that confirms an initial decision and ignoring contradicting evidenceOnly reading positive reviews after deciding to buy a product
Overconfidence BiasOverestimating the accuracy of predictions or one's own skillBelieving your forecast is correct despite poor track record
Escalation of CommitmentContinuing a failing course of action ('throwing good money after bad') due to sunk costseBay outbid notifications are designed to trigger this; Digg rejecting Google's $20M offer

Tips to Improve Decision Making

  • Be aware of natural biases and heuristics
  • Use confidence intervals rather than single-point estimates
  • Use trial-and-error calibration with feedback
  • Engage in healthy skepticism — question initial impressions

Rational Decision Making (6 Steps)

  1. Determine the appropriate criteria
  2. Generate a list of available alternatives
  3. Evaluate alternatives against the criteria
  4. Choose the solution that maximizes value
  5. Implement the appropriate solution
  6. Test whether the solution delivers expected outcome

W4B: Learning

Types of knowledge, methods of learning, and growth mindset

What Is Learning?

Definition

Learning reflects relatively permanent changesin an individual's knowledge or skill that result from experience.

Explicit Knowledge

  • Can be described in formal language
  • Readily available to most people
  • Often based on established work processes

Tacit Knowledge

  • "Know-how" acquired through experience
  • Difficult or impossible to articulate to others
  • Often resembles intuition

Three Methods of Learning

Observation

Social Learning Theory (Bandura, 1977)

People learn by watching others. Behavioral modeling: observe → learn → repeat the observed behavior. Effective when models are credible and rewarded.

Reinforcement

Reinforcement Theory

People repeat behaviors they are rewarded for. Positive reinforcement strengthens desired behaviors. Combines with observation: you imitate AND get rewarded.

Experimenting

Experiential Learning

Learning by doing. Hands-on experience helps connect knowledge to real-world situations. More effective than passive reading or listening.

Goal Orientation

Goal orientation is one's reason for engaging in tasks — it affects motivation and performance at work.

Mastery Orientation

Goal: to learn, gain knowledge, and grow. Intrinsically motivated by the learning process itself.

"I study BADM 310 to gain knowledge about management."

Outcome: 33% employment rate in studies

Performance Orientation

Goal: to outperform others or avoid failure. Motivated by comparison and grades.

"I study BADM 310 to get an A."

Outcome: 9% employment rate in studies

Growth vs. Fixed Mindset

Implicit Learning Theory (Dweck): what we believe about our own ability determines how we approach tasks and respond to feedback.

Growth Mindset

Belief that ability can be developed through effort and practice. Leads to mastery goal orientation.

  • Embraces challenges and persists after setbacks
  • Views feedback as learning, not criticism
  • Effort is the path to mastery

Fixed Mindset

Belief that ability is innate and unchangeable. Leads to performance goal orientation.

  • Avoids challenges where failure is possible
  • Gives up quickly when obstacles arise
  • Sees effort as pointless if talent is fixed

Real-World Impact

  • Growth mindset → learning goal orientation → effort → success
  • Helps diverse teams outperform in business simulations (Pieterse et al., 2013)
  • Microsoft under CEO Satya Nadella shifted culture from "know-it-all" to "learn-it-all"
  • Recruiters: "I don't care how good they are — I care how much they are improving."
Week 5Personality, Cultural Values, and Ability

W5A: Personality

The Big Five (OCEAN), MBTI, and their links to organizational behavior

What Is Personality?

An enduring pattern of behavior, thoughts, and emotions shown by individuals.

Personality is stable across time and situations. It is a descriptive taxonomy — not a judgment of character.

The Big Five (OCEAN / CANOE)

A scientifically validated model derived from factor analysis of all known personality traits. Five broad dimensions that together describe the full range of human personality.

OOpenness to Experience

High scorers:

Curious, imaginative, creative, complex, refined, sophisticated

Low scorers:

Uninquisitive, conventional, conforming, simple, unartistic

OB link: Creative task performance

CConscientiousness

High scorers:

Dependable, organized, reliable, ambitious, hardworking, persevering

Low scorers:

Careless, sloppy, inefficient, negligent, lazy, irresponsible

OB link: Task & citizenship performance, commitment — strongest predictor of job performance

EExtraversion

High scorers:

Talkative, sociable, passionate, assertive, bold, dominant

Low scorers:

Quiet, shy, inhibited, bashful, reserved, submissive

OB link: Positive affect and leader emergence

AAgreeableness

High scorers:

Kind, cooperative, sympathetic, helpful, courteous, warm

Low scorers:

Critical, antagonistic, callous, selfish, rude, cold

OB link: Interpersonal citizenship behavior

NNeuroticism

High scorers:

Nervous, moody, emotional, insecure, jealous, unstable

Low scorers:

Calm, steady, relaxed, at ease, secure, contented

OB link: Negative affect (stress) and job dissatisfaction

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

A popular personality framework based on four dichotomies. Widely used for self-awareness training in organizations.

E vs. I: Extraversion vs. Introversion

How you get energy — from external sources or from within.

S vs. N: Sensing vs. Intuition

How you take in information — concrete details or abstract patterns.

T vs. F: Thinking vs. Feeling

How you make decisions — logic-based or values-based.

J vs. P: Judging vs. Perceiving

How you relate to the outside world — structured or flexible.

Important Caveat

MBTI is useful for self-awareness discussions but is not supported by high-quality research evidence as a predictor of job performance. The Big Five has far stronger empirical support.

W5B: Ability

Cognitive ability, emotional intelligence, and predicting job performance

Performance = Ability × Motivation

Ability is the relatively stable capability people have to perform a particular range of related activities.

When hiring managers try to predict job performance and retention, past performance is the best predictor of future performance.

Cognitive Ability (Intelligence)

Definition

The ability of the human brain to process, store, and extract information, including attention, memory, and reasoning ability.

Research Evidence (Hunter & Hunter, 1984 meta-analysis)

  • General cognitive ability accounts for 26% of job performance variance
  • Accounts for 25% of college GPA variance
  • One of the biggest predictors of new hire performance

Emotional Intelligence (EI)

The ability to carry out accurate reasoning about emotions and to use emotions and emotional knowledge to enhance thought and actions.

Self-Awareness

Understand and accurately express the emotions you are experiencing.

Self-Management

Quickly recover from emotional experiences; control your own feelings.

Social Awareness

Recognize and understand the emotions other individuals are feeling.

Relationship Management

Harness emotions to improve chances of success in a given situation.

Who Needs EI at Work?

  • Leaders (motivating and influencing others)
  • Team members (collaboration and conflict resolution)
  • People in jobs requiring "emotional labor" (service, healthcare, teaching)

Ability as a Predictor of Job Performance

Better Predictors

  • Past performance
  • Cognitive ability
  • Growth mindset

Worse Predictors

  • First impressions
  • Similarity to recruiter
  • Unstructured interview questions

W5C: Cultural Values

Hofstede's six cultural dimensions and their organizational implications

National Culture

The shared values, societal traditions, and collective programming that underlie culture — influencing expectations and behaviors in the workplace.

Managers must be aware of underlying cultural assumptions, not just visible surface differences. Approaches that work well in one culture may not work well in another.

Hofstede's Six Cultural Dimensions

Individualism vs. Collectivism

The degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members.

Collectivism

Strong ties; communal interests valued over individual.

e.g. Colombia, China, Japan, Pakistan

Individualism

Loose ties; each person looks after their own interests.

e.g. United States, Canada, Australia

Power Distance

How people expect and accept unequal power distribution.

Low Power Distance

Egalitarian; flat hierarchies; subordinates challenge authority.

e.g. United States, Australia, Israel

High Power Distance

Paternalistic and autocratic; hierarchies respected.

e.g. Malaysia, India, Mexico

Masculine vs. Feminine

What motivates people to work — wanting to be the best vs. liking what you do.

Feminine

Values caring for others and quality of life.

e.g. Sweden, Netherlands, Russia, Iceland

Masculine

Values competition, achievement, and success.

e.g. China, Germany, Japan

Uncertainty Avoidance

How comfortable society members are with uncertainty and ambiguity.

Low UA

Relaxed; tolerates deviation from norms; comfortable with risk.

e.g. Jamaica, China

High UA

Rigid and rule-following; tries to control the future.

e.g. Italy, Chile, Greece

Long-Term vs. Short-Term Orientation

How society maintains links with its past and how it plans for the future.

Short-Term

Maintains time-honored traditions; avoids change.

e.g. United States, Morocco, Iran

Long-Term

Pragmatic; focuses on the future and adapts to change.

e.g. South Korea, France, Switzerland, China

Indulgence vs. Restraint

How children are socialized to control their desires and impulses.

Restraint

Values self-control; suppression of gratification.

e.g. India, China, Bangladesh

Indulgence

Values leisure, fun, and self-gratification.

e.g. Australia, Chile, Sweden